I got tired of reading coverage that missed the point.
Federal health IT affects millions of service members, veterans, and their families. The coverage should match the stakes. Most of it doesn't. So I built something that does.
The gap isn't technical. It's about who's telling the story.
The decisions made inside DHA, VA, and Congress don't stay in briefing rooms. They ripple out to contractors bidding work, clinicians using the systems, and service members waiting on care. When those decisions get covered badly — or not at all — real people pay for it.
Most coverage is either press releases with a new headline or 80-page reports nobody reads. I wanted something in between — clear enough to act on, deep enough to trust, and honest enough to say when something isn't working.
We can coordinate a kill chain across three domains in milliseconds, but we can't move a veteran's health record across town. That's the gap I cover.
Four rules I don't break.
Evidence Over Opinion
If I can't source it, I don't publish it. Dates, dollars, and operational consequences — or it doesn't go out.
Nobody Pays Me to Be Nice
No vendor sponsors this. No employer shapes the analysis. If a program is failing, I say so. Independence is the product.
Say It So People Can Use It
Complex policy deserves clear explanation. If you have to Google three acronyms to understand the paragraph, I've failed.
Mission First
Everything passes through one question: does this help someone take care of a service member or a veteran? If not, I don't cover it.
Who's behind this.
Mary Womack
Founder, Mission Meets Tech
I've spent my career where federal health policy hits the ground — inside DoD, DHA, VA, and civilian agencies, working on the systems that actually reach clinicians and service members. I know where the friction is because I've worked inside it.
That experience taught me something uncomfortable: most analysis of this space either misses the operational stakes or avoids the hard questions. I built MMT to cover the gap honestly — for the people who can't afford to get this wrong.
Sara Byrd
Co-Host, Fed UP Podcast & Strategy Principal, Byrd Strategies
Sara is a strategist and executive leader who has spent more than 15 years making emerging technology work inside federal agencies. Across civilian and defense organizations, federal acquisition, and innovation strategy, she has helped leaders turn complex ideas into practical outcomes.
She's known for helping leaders navigate how new technologies actually function inside complex mission environments — bridging technical innovation with institutional reality.
Her work increasingly focuses on the evolving relationship between human judgment and intelligent systems, exploring how AI can amplify human capability while maintaining credibility, accountability, and trust.
Connect on LinkedInFive lenses shape every analysis.
Readiness Test
Does this make the force more capable? Every dollar, contract, and policy decision gets measured here first.
Governance Paradox
Is a governance structure a legitimate safeguard or a mission-killing bottleneck?
Third Way
What realistic bridge exists between legacy constraints and modern delivery?
Human Cost
Who pays when this fails? The stakes are always concrete: a medic, a veteran, a broken process.
Market Signal
Where are the money and attention flowing? Contract awards, budget moves, and personnel changes are leading indicators.
Why teams trust Mission Meets Tech
- ✓ Independent and reader-funded. No vendor sponsors, no conflicts.
- ✓ Your documents are never used to train AI models. Privacy by architecture.
- ✓ Institutional plans include multi-seat access and included tool credits.
Pick a path.
Read the latest analysis. Subscribe free. Score a proposal. Request a market brief.
MMT Tools